By Fred Shuster
City News Service
LOS ANGELES (CNS) – A Los Angeles federal judge has rejected the Trump administration’s attempt to end a closely watched lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) alleging immigration raids in Southern California are not just unlawful, but deliberately designed to target Latino communities, according to court papers obtained Wednesday, Aug. 12.
Residents, workers and advocacy groups sued the DHS in July 2025, alleging unconstitutional stop and detention practices by agents tied to arbitrary enforcement quotas. An amended complaint filed in LA federal court earlier this year adds new claims of violations of equal protection and use of unreasonable tactics by DHS agents.
Government attorneys then asked the court to immediately toss the case, arguing that accusations in the updated version of the complaint are not enough to support plaintiffs’ legal claims.
On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Maame Frimpong, who is overseeing the case, determined in a written ruling that “the accusations are enough for this case to go forward at this time,” and denied the DHS’ bid to have the lawsuit thrown out.
The judge emphasized that at this stage in the proceedings, she has made no finding on the truth of the allegations, an issue that would be determined later.
In the amended complaint, the plaintiffs argued the government is intentionally discriminating against Latino communities in California, choosing whom to stop and which locations to raid based on race, and treating Latino people differently because of their apparent ethnicity.
They also argued that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol were using highly intrusive tactics in carrying out the raids – such as handcuffing, confinement, moving people to a secondary location and prolonged detention. Agents, the plaintiffs contend, were quick to both show and use force, often arriving with weapons drawn and using force even when subjects were already compliant. Such tactics are unreasonable and turn encounters into unlawful arrests, the plaintiffs allege.
When the complaint was filed last year, Frimpong issued a temporary restraining order limiting certain enforcement actions, but in August 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the government’s request to stay that order while litigation proceeds, allowing the challenged practices to continue.
A message seeking comment from DHS/ICE was not immediately answered Wednesday.
Trump administration officials have previously defended the stepped-up enforcement on a number of levels, saying the crackdown is necessary to maintain the rule of law, to capture violent criminals in the country illegally and to reverse the flood of people who poured over the U.S. Mexico border during the Biden administration.
However, Eva Bitran, the ACLU Foundation of Southern California’s immigrants’ rights director, has said the stops are “discriminatory in design and execution. ICE and Border Patrol’s racist agenda extends from DHS leadership down to rank-and-file officers who deliberately target Latino community members – often with great force – because of their race. Our community suffers the consequences of this unconstitutional conduct.”
The suit was brought by five individual Latino workers and three membership organizations – the LA Worker Center Network, United Farm Workers and the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights – as well as Immigrant Defenders Law Center, a legal services provider.