By MARGARET SHUTTLEWORTH

City News Service

LOS ANGELES (CNS) — People residing in the city limits of Los Angeles, as of Tuesday, May 31, are now limited to two-day per week outdoor watering schedules based on street addresses as part of an effort to conserve water amid a historic drought.

The restrictions, approved by a 13-0 City Council vote after being announced by Mayor Eric Garcetti, are more lenient than the one-day limit ordered earlier by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California for areas that are dependent on water from the State Water Project.

Effective Tuesday, outdoor watering is restricted to two days per week, down from the current three, with watering permitted at odd-numbered street addresses on Mondays and Fridays, and at even-numbered addresses on Thursdays and Sundays.

Watering with sprinklers will be limited to eight minutes per station. Sprinklers with water-conserving nozzles will be limited to 15 minutes per station.

All watering will have to be done in the evening or early morning, with no watering permitted outdoors between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.

“We were given two paths … and we chose path two, to go with a budgeted volumetric limit for the city of Los Angeles. While most other agencies affected by this need to limit their outdoor watering to one day to comply, we believe that in the city of LA we can comply with two-day-a-week watering, and that’s thanks to our customers’ tireless efforts to make conservation a way of life here in Los Angeles,” David Pettijohn, director of water resources for the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, told the City Council on May 25.

The city also urged residents with pools to use pool covers to reduce the risk of evaporation and called on people to wash their vehicles only at commercial car wash facilities.

The city’s water restrictions will be enforced by the Conservation

Response Unit, which will focus on areas that are using the most water, according to DWP General Manager and Chief Engineer Marty Adams. He said the department will re-assign employees to ensure coverage in all areas of the city and might bring on additional personnel during the summer.

Enforcement will begin with education for people who are violating the ordinance but will escalate with fines and tickets if needed. Penalties begin with a written warning, then $200 for a second written violation, $400 for a third written violation, and $600 for a fourth written violation.

“Beyond that, we have the ability to put flow restrictors on people’s use if they are recalcitrant and do not comply, and then we also have the ultimate option of terminating service if somebody is really just scofflaw against the ordinance,” Pettijohn said.

Adams said the department has given “very few fines in past droughts,” adding that people are typically happy to comply with restrictions.

In the last four years, the department has issued 552 citations, with only 15 resulting in fines, according to Pettijohn.

Meanwhile, many people outside the city of Los Angeles are restricted to one day per week of watering effective Tuesday, as announced by the MWD on April 26. That restriction will apply to the district’s member agencies that are heavily dependent on supplies from the State Water Project, but the agency called on all Southern California residents and businesses to slash water use by 30% to combat drought conditions “unlike anything we’ve experienced before.”

MWD member agencies that fail to enforce the requirement among their customers will face fines of up to $2,000 per acre-foot of water supplied by MWD that exceeds monthly allocation limits.

The State Water Resources Control Board voted last week to ban the watering of non-functional turf at commercial, industrial and institutional properties.

The ban — which does not include turf at residences or turf used for recreation or community purposes — will be effective once approved by the Office of Administrative Law, which typically takes about 10 days, according to the board. Violations would be punishable by a fine of up to $500.

In recent months, the DWP has urged customers to take advantage of its rebates to make water conservation transitions less expensive, including for people who replace their lawns with sustainable and drought-tolerant landscaping. Residential and commercial customers can get $3 per square foot of turf for up to 5,000 square feet, and public agencies can get $4 per square foot for up to 200,000 square feet of turf. The agency also gives a $6 rebate for rotating sprinkler nozzles.

Residential customers can also receive $500 rebates for high-efficiency clothes-washer purchases and $250 for water-efficient toilet purchases.

According to the DWP, the more efficient appliances can reduce water use by more than 11,000 gallons per year. Rebate-eligible toilets use about 30% less water than standard models.

DWP business customers can receive $300 rebates for low-flush toilets, which used to have a rebate of $250. Bathroom and kitchen faucet aerators and high-efficiency showerheads are available for free.

Multi-family, commercial and industrial building owners who install large-scale water conservation systems can also receive a $2 million incentive, which was increased earlier this year from $250,000. The Technical Assistance Program incentive is available for pre-approved cooling towers, recirculation systems, recycling microfiltration systems and other upgrades that reduce potable water use by a minimum of 50,000 gallons over two years.

More information is available at https://bit.ly/3wjPxo9.

One reply on “2-Day Per Week Outdoor Watering Restrictions Take Effect in City of LA”

  1. There are facts the City Council needs to consider. In order to avoid strict limitations as during the past, account for home and yard configurations, ie, hilly (runoff) vs. flat (drench), size of properties, public properties, old pipes beneath streets, schedules of gardeners who rely on their jobs, and other possible inequities. To cause dying foliage will have an environmental impact in the long run. If desalination and other thoughtful actions had been taken years ago, California would not be in this bind.
    A blanket program to cover all constituents is not effective

Comments are closed.